<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Electric WafflePR Fail | The Electric Waffle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kaseyskala.com/tag/pr-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kaseyskala.com</link>
	<description>An Integrated Approach to PR &#38; Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:05:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How NOT to find success with social media</title>
		<link>http://kaseyskala.com/how-not-to-find-success-with-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://kaseyskala.com/how-not-to-find-success-with-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kasey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media Fail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kaseyskala.com/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know there are a lot of articles and commentary that touch on &#8220;how to succeed in social media&#8221;. Heck, I recently wrote a piece on it &#8211; This social media thing is easy. So instead of compiling another list of things that you should be doing, I&#8217;m going to give a list of things...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_nbb18XI9_ek/SO0VFVNsHOI/AAAAAAAAqt4/Rn3A5MGFf3E/s400/funny-img-010.jpg" alt="" width="280" height="210" />I know there are a lot of articles and commentary that touch on &#8220;how to succeed in social media&#8221;. Heck, I recently wrote a piece on it &#8211; <a href="http://kaseyskala.com/2009/07/this-new-media-thing-is-easy/" target="_blank">This social media thing is easy</a>. So instead of compiling another list of things that you <em>should </em>be doing, I&#8217;m going to give a list of things you <em>should NOT</em> be doing.<em> </em></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Using social media as a sales tool.</strong> If you want to sell a product or service, get into a sales role.</li>
<li><strong>Focusing on your brand.</strong> It&#8217;s not about you and it&#8217;s not about your brand. <a href="http://skalaspeak.blogspot.com/2009/04/web-20-isnt-about-you.html" target="_blank">It&#8217;s about your customer(s)</a>.</li>
<li><strong>Ignoring requests/customers.</strong> Chris Brogan recently commented that<a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/how-i-use-twitter-at-volume/" target="_blank"> it&#8217;s impossible for him to reply to everyone</a>, but he does his best to respond to as many as he can. This is how you use social media. If you&#8217;re a brand, you MUST respond to every inquiry.</li>
<li><strong>Trying to be cute.</strong> Yes, social media allows your brand to interact on a more personal level, but you need to remain professional and remember you&#8217;re still running a business.</li>
<li><strong>Using a &#8220;see what happens&#8221; approach.</strong> I know social media is new, I know it can be overwhelming; but you shouldn&#8217;t get involved without a plan. It&#8217;s one thing to learn as you go, but using social media to <a href="http://www.davidwmullen.com/2009/06/16/should-brands-approach-social-media-with-a-pilot-program-mindset/" target="_blank">&#8220;throw things against the wall and see what sticks&#8221;</a> won&#8217;t work. You&#8217;re community will call you out and call you out hard.</li>
</ul>
<p>There are a lot of brands that are using social media the right way. Unfortunately, there are far more using it the wrong way. Each brand&#8217;s strategy is different and you need to tailor your plan accordingly. There isn&#8217;t a magical recipe out there, but if you avoid the common mistakes listed above, you&#8217;ll be on the right path.<br />
Folks, what other &#8216;do&#8217;s&#8217; and &#8216;dont&#8217;s&#8217; are out there? What are some of your tips for success?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kaseyskala.com/how-not-to-find-success-with-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ethics &#8211; They still apply</title>
		<link>http://kaseyskala.com/ethics-they-still-apply/</link>
		<comments>http://kaseyskala.com/ethics-they-still-apply/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kasey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[El Pollo Loco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden State Warriors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KFC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR Crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kaseyskala.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[News travels fast. With the number of people online, your voice and message has a global reach the minute you hit send/post. The benefit of this is a 24/7 society that feeds on the immediate availability of news. But with anything, the risk has the ability to outweigh the reward. Case in point &#8211; NBA...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://www.petersonfrederick.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/ethics-question1.jpg" alt="" width="296" height="210" />News travels fast. With the number of people online, your voice and message has a global reach the minute you hit send/post. The benefit of this is a 24/7 society that feeds on the immediate availability of news. But with anything, the risk has the ability to outweigh the reward. Case in point &#8211; <a href="http://blogs.mercurynews.com/kawakami/2009/05/21/warriors-pr-director-confirms-he-authored-anonymous-blog-comment/" target="_blank">NBA PR &#8220;fail&#8221;</a></p>
<p>What have we learned in the PR world recently?<br />
- We&#8217;ve seen <a href="http://www.break.com/usercontent/2009/4/Gross-Dominos-Pizza-704482.html" target="_blank">Dominos&#8217; image tarnish</a> in a matter of minutes, if not seconds.<br />
* <em>Respectfully, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7l6AJ49xNSQ" target="_blank">here</a> is their response.</em><br />
- The <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssConsumerGoodsAndRetailNews/idUSN0848545420090508" target="_blank">KFC mess</a> via Oprah.<br />
- And my personal favorite, KFC attempts to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jyn7iDJQnyQ" target="_blank">prank</a> El Pollo Loco. Ouch, KFC has had a rough 2009 thus far!<br />
<span id="more-17"></span><br />
With all these, we learned that word spreads fast. Especially when it&#8217;s negative. But let&#8217;s focus in on the recent PR stunt that the Golden State Warriors&#8217; PR head pulled.</p>
<p>Raymond Ridder, a 10+ year PR veteran, decides that public opinion about his employer (GS Warriors) isn&#8217;t very positive. Forget the fact that they only won 29 games this year, but that&#8217;s another issue for another time. So, what should a PR pro do? Let&#8217;s go to the source of this negative opinion and try to &#8220;spin&#8221; the community&#8217;s thoughts. That&#8217;s ethical, right? After all, it&#8217;s up to the brand (again, the Warriors) to shape public opinion. It&#8217;s the job of the PR department to shape how our community (in this case NBA fans) is talking about us. We determine the message, we determine the response. That&#8217;s how PR works, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>I understand that PR has changed over the years. Heck, it&#8217;s changed drastically since I graduated five years ago. But I&#8217;m pretty sure this was Rule #1 in that &#8216;Ethics 101&#8242; course I took. You know that class you dreaded because it talked about all those boring case studies. *<em>Professor Menke, I really don&#8217;t think the ethics course you taught was boring. I actually enjoyed it.</em></p>
<p>What this guy did (I won&#8217;t refer to him as a PR pro anymore) is basically take all the work us honest and ethical PR folks are doing to clear our industry, threw it to the ground and spit on it. It&#8217;s people like this Ridder character, and his actions, that cause our industry to be referred to as &#8220;flacks&#8221;. Mr. Ridder, if you prefer to be called a &#8220;flack,&#8221; by all means, we can arrange for that.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve heard of <a href="http://www.intel.com" target="_blank">Intel</a>, right? Pretty big company. Let&#8217;s take a look at their <a href="http://www.intel.com/sites/sitewide/en_US/social-media.htm" target="_blank">social media guidelines</a>. Skip over the first section, although it is important, and go to &#8216;Rules of Engagement.&#8221;</p>
<p>#1 &#8211; be transparent. You failed there.<br />
#2 &#8211; be judicious. He said he did it on his own, so maybe it didn&#8217;t violate company policy.<br />
#3 &#8211; write what you know. Ummm&#8230;I&#8217;d say you failed here too.<br />
#4 &#8211; perception is reality. Ah, here we go. I like this rule. Well, you had no chance at following this basic guideline, err rule.</p>
<p>I think you get where I am going here. How can a so-called leader of an organization blatantly try to mislead and lie to its community and expect any sort of trust and support from said community? Posting anonymously and trying to &#8220;guide the conversation in the &#8216;right&#8217; direction&#8221; is basically like telling your audience that you think they&#8217;re stupid. That&#8217;s what it comes down to.</p>
<p>If the PR industry has any chance of finally getting rid of the &#8220;flack&#8221; label that is associated with it, actions like this MUST stop. It&#8217;s scary how often basic ethics are often overlooked in an effort to advance an organization&#8217;s message. PR folks, you need to realize that the public will eventually call your bluff. Quit trying to be sneaky. Your audience will call you out. What Mr. Ridder should have done is engage his community, acknowledge the concerns and find methods to cure those concerns. Instead, the Golden State Warriors have a bigger issue than their losing record to solve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kaseyskala.com/ethics-they-still-apply/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

